Photos of James Webb circulating on social media this week debunked the Big Bang theory and sparked a

James Webb Space Telescope photos don’t debunk the Big Bang

The Big Bang theory has been the dominant explanation for the origin of the universe since it was first proposed in 1927.

The theory suggests that the universe started out as just a point, expanding and stretching over the next 13.8 billion years, becoming the still-expanding universe we know today.

When NASA sent its James Webb Space Telescope into orbit in December, it was hoped that the $10 billion space telescope would help unravel the mystery of what happened after the Big Bang.

Photos of James Webb circulating on social media this week debunked the Big Bang theory and sparked a “cosmologist panic” claim.

However, these claims are simply incorrect and are based on misinterpreted quotes and data.

Photos of James Webb circulating on social media this week debunked the Big Bang theory and sparked a “cosmologist panic” claim.However, these claims are simply not true and are based on misunderstood quotes and data

When NASA sent its James Webb Space Telescope into orbit in December, it was hoped that the $10 billion space telescope would help unravel the mystery of what happened after the Big Bang

When NASA sent its James Webb Space Telescope into orbit in December, it was hoped that the $10 billion space telescope would help unravel the mystery of what happened after the Big Bang

big bang theory

The Big Bang Theory is the main explanation for the origin of the universe.

In short, it says that the Universe as we know it began as an infinitely hot and dense single point, expanding and stretching over the next 13.8 billion years—first at unimaginable rates, and then at a more measurable rate. Velocity – to the still-expanding Universe we know today.

While most of the astronomical community accepts this theory, there are some theorists who have other explanations for the Big Bang—such as eternal inflation or an oscillating universe.

Source: Space.com

The claims stem from an article published earlier this month in the Institute for Arts and Minds by Eric Leaner, a big bang fanatic.

His article claimed that the big bang did not happen, citing photographs taken by James Webb as evidence.

Reiner, however, misinterpreted James Webb’s early data, suggesting astronomers were concerned that the Big Bang theory was incorrect.

Lina cites a paper that begins with “Panic!” – He called it “a candid exclamation.”

But read the rest of the title and you’ll find the use of “Panic!” followed by “At the Disks” – a clever pun for the band Panic! In the discotheque, instead of worrying exclamations.

Meanwhile, Leaner abused a quote from University of Kansas astronomer Allison Kirkpatrick.

He quoted Kirkpatrick as saying: “Now I find myself waking up at three in the morning wondering if everything I did was wrong.”

This quote comes from a Nature News article published on July 27, but doesn’t directly cite the Big Bang theory.

Instead, Kirkpatrick was talking about the first data on the early evolution of the universe that James Webb sent back.

The Big Bang Theory is a cosmological model used to describe the beginning and evolution of our universe, based on observations - including the cosmic background radiation (pictured), which is like the fossilized radiation emitted at the beginning of the universe, when hot and dense

The Big Bang Theory is a cosmological model used to describe the beginning and evolution of our universe, based on observations – including the cosmic background radiation (pictured), which is like the fossilized radiation emitted at the beginning of the universe, when hot and dense

Kirkpatrick herself has repeatedly said her quote was misused in the article, insisting that she is a believer in the Big Bang Theory.

‘It’s wild. Especially since I never said those words!she tweet From her account, she renamed it “Alison Big Bang in Kirkpatrick”.

One of the key reasons why the Big Bang remains the leading theory of the origin of our universe is because of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) – radiation Leftovers from the Big Bang.

Scientists have been able to “see” this radiation through satellites, including NASA’s Cosmic Background Explorer, which operated between 1989 and 1996.

While Lerner has offered other explanations for the CMB, these have been rejected in the past.

James Webb was not designed to see the CMB, but to see an unprecedented period in the history of the universe.

During the Q&A session, Nobel Laureate and James Webb Space Telescope Senior Project Scientist Dr John Mather explained: “Specifically, we want to see the first objects that formed as the universe cooled after the Big Bang.

“That time period was probably hundreds of millions of years later than COBE [Cosmic Background Explorer]map [Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe]while Planck was built to see.

“We think that the tiny temperature fluctuations they observed are the seeds that eventually grow into galaxies.

“We don’t know when the universe produced its first stars and galaxies — or how.” That’s the question we’re building JWST to help answer.

James Webb Telescope: NASA’s $10 billion telescope aims to detect light from earliest stars and galaxies

The James Webb Telescope has been described as a “time machine” that could help unlock the secrets of our universe.

The telescope will be used to trace back the first galaxies that were born in the early universe more than 13.5 billion years ago, observing the origin of stars, exoplanets, and even the moons and planets of our solar system.

Already costing more than $7bn (£5bn), the massive telescope is believed to be the successor to the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope

The James Webb Telescope and most of its instruments operate at about 40 Kelvin—about minus 387 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 233 degrees Celsius).

It is the largest and most powerful orbiting space telescope in the world, capable of going back 100 to 200 million years after the Big Bang.

The Orbiting Infrared Observatory is designed to be 100 times more capable than its predecessor, the Hubble Space Telescope.

NASA likes to think of James Webb as a successor to Hubble rather than a replacement, as the two will work together for some time.

The Hubble telescope was launched on April 24, 1990, on the Space Shuttle Discovery at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

It orbits the Earth at about 17,000 mph (27,300 km/h) in low-Earth orbit at an altitude of about 340 miles.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.